About this Entry
Posted by: RyanC481

Visit RyanC481's Xanga Site

Original: 10/11/2008 4:31 PM
Views: 155
Comments: 10
eProps: 14

Read Comments
Post a Comment
Back to Your Xanga Site



Saturday, October 11, 2008

 

Its wierd that almost a year ago, I put Obama in the bottom half of all the democratic candidates running for president.  I also considered John McCain top 3/top 2 compared to all the other republicans.

Wierd how things have changed.

The reason I liked McCain was reading about his biography during the 1998-2002 era.  He was well respected by a lot of democrats.  He was able to pass a bipartisan alliance (gang of 14) in stopping some ridiculous bills being passed.  He was able to think outside of his party.  Too bad that the McCain that I liked in 2000, does not exist anymore.

I will say this.  John McCain has lost his soul, he has lost all of the dignity, after this past couple of weeks.

I really don't care if he's a republican or democrat.  When McCain and Palin are speaking at rallies, they have a responsibility to control their crowds.  They also have a responsibility to treat their competitors (Obama and Biden) with respect.

However, they did not.  During several rallies (including one in Strongsville Ohio) this past week, people in the crowds (very clearly) were screaming huge insults and threats to Obama.  These included "He's an Arab" "Terrorist", "Traitor", "Kill him", "Lynch him" etc.  McCain and Palin had a chance to tell these people to be respectful.  Instead, they continued to talk and let all of these character slanders continue.

McCain was so incredibly disrespectful to Obama, calling him "That one", never looking him in the eye.  He was very resistent in shaking his hand after the debate.  Although I am disappointed, I shouldn't been shocked since I watched the Republican Primary debates in January.  McCain laughed at Ron Paul completely belittling him, and made comments such as "You aren't going to win"  "We will miss you in the next debate" etc...so it doesn't come off as a surprise that he's being disrespectful to Obama.

I am upset that McCain has run the dirtiest campaign.  Its ironic that when he lost to Bush in 2000, he accused Bush of throwing him under the bus and completely smearing him.  Because right now that is what he is doing to Obama, making ads that send the message of "Obama is "the one" (code for antichrist)", "Obama does not care about Latinos (subtle message for...let's drive a bigger wedge between the black and latino community), "Obama is linked to Bill Ayers and Wright (coincidentally just this week...when McCain could easily could have addressed that a long time ago).

I find it somewhat frustrating that a huge amount of Evangelicals are supporting the republican party for "morals".  John McCain and Sarah Palin have sold out their morals and their dignity by doing the worst type of character assassination.  Palin has become the Christian Machivellian, using morals when its convenient, but sacrificing it for strategic tactics in getting to the white house.  I disappointed in John McCain, and I have lost all respect for him.

 Posted 10/11/2008 4:31 PM - 155 Views - 14 eProps - 10 comments

Give eProps or Post a Comment

10 Comments

Visit deep_deep_dark's Xanga Site!
amen to that. it's a scary world when john mccain resorts to things like this.
Posted 10/11/2008 4:49 PM by deep_deep_dark - reply

Visit brownize221's Xanga Site!
I actually liked McCain too. I think a lot of people have lost respect for him. And when he loses this fall, many Republicans will breathe a sigh of relief because when it was Clinton/Obama-McCain/Huckabee, McCain was the devil, was the LIBERAL, was the fraud, etc.etc. and so to hear him begin this way is disheartening.

the "that one" comment wouldn't have been so bad, if it weren't so evident before that point that mcCain had been worn down by the racism that has run amuck in the Republican camp. If he treated the man with respect in other cases, it would've just rolled off quite easily, but it seems racist because it vocalized what his body language and overwhelming lack of class (letting people call him Arab, Muslim, etc) had proven before.

At least, I believe that Barack really is a decent person. I know that to get that high up, you gotta do some cruddy things, get involved w/ some cooked people - but Barack hasn't slid to the point of utter disrespect.

And don't get me started on that woman. It don't make no kinda sense. None!
Posted 10/11/2008 5:31 PM by brownize221 Xanga True Member - reply

Visit ceruleanbubbles6's Xanga Site!
I agree!!!
Posted 10/11/2008 6:33 PM by ceruleanbubbles6 - reply

Visit moonpi's Xanga Site!
thanks for presenting a well-reasoned and mature critique of McCain's character.  Sheesh, it's hard to read a critique of McCain/Palin anymore that doesn't reduce to mockery and malice (e.g., the people who call Palin a man.)  That stuff always leaves me with a bad taste in my mouth. =P
Posted 10/12/2008 12:50 PM by moonpi - reply

Visit givinitup2him's Xanga Site!
agreed. well written.
Posted 10/12/2008 10:10 PM by givinitup2him - reply

Visit Riceman5938's Xanga Site!

yeah... but even if Obama is running his campaign "better/cleaner" - I don't feel like I would trust that man any more in the position as President.  Unfortunately, with two "great sinners" running for President, and if I am "forced" to vote - I will vote for the one, even as sinful as he is, that has the platform which alligns more closely to what I support.

And if you're going to be angry/upset at McCain - be angry at the rest of the nation of America as well - b/c the harsh belittling is something that occurs every week in competitions like this (football, baseball) - where humility is not honored, but arrogance instead.  I don't mean the players necessarily, but I definitely mean the fans.  If anything, the Olympics have "more class" b/c everybody is representing their nation (both fans and competitors).  But when it comes to representing "your side" in America (with freedom of speech, freedom of representation, basically freedom to do whatever you want ALMOST to the extent without any humility or accountability), it leads to the constant belitting, mud-slinging, hateful, and ignorant responses - why?  B/c... "we" want to win.

Actually, it's too bad there's no default... like... to go a year without a president, b/c majority of people weren't comfortable to vote.  ... now THAT... would be a sight to see.  If the majority of the citizens of America just didn't vote, and then going a "year or so without a President."  But then for people to say something like "I don't feel comfortable voting for either of them", then getting targetted for not taking responsibility of their right and not taking responsibility for weighing the candidates and platforms properly, etc.

But I think we should all write in "Jesus Christ, the Son of God" and vote for him.

Posted 10/13/2008 12:29 PM by Riceman5938 - reply

Visit Wesican's Xanga Site!
i am so thankfun for your insight and in general keeping me informed while i'm here in Honduras.  i'm thinking Ryan Chan President 2012 with his running mate J. Wesley Norvell
Posted 10/13/2008 1:13 PM by Wesican - reply

Visit RyanC481's Xanga Site!

@Wesican - lol Wes.  I would never run for president or government office.  So much temptation to sling mud at people in campaigns, take bribes from people with power, firing people just because "you can".  (The Obama campaign from OSU just called me like 5 minutes ago...I have no idea how they got my phone number, so creepy).  Politics is like Survivor....only its real life.  I would never touch a governmental position with a ten feet pole.  Anyways, sorry about not hanging out with you at Columbus.  I lost your phone number.

P.S. I wouldn't be old enough to be president during 2012 :p

@Riceman5938 - Thanks for your comments.  Your comment about "we want to win" is interesting. That phrase is actually the reason why I've been seperating from the Republican party more and more (for this period).  This is the party that calls themselves the Christian party, the party with morals and values, the party with moral integrity, the party that follows the laws of the constitution.  For a party that labels themselves these things, they have done a lot of things that contradicts what they say about themselves.  Stuff like the Patriot act, FISA, promoting torture, guantanamo are complete violations to the constitution.  For a party that has "moral integrity", they have no problems labeling their opponent as "Scary", "antichrist", "airheaded celebrity", "terrorist", "traitor" etc.  Why?  Its exactly like the quote you said, because they want to win. 

 I find that very very problamatic, especially since many non-christians are watching this campaign.   Because the message that is being sent out to them is ,.  "Republican Party is the Christian party, the party of morals and values, but when it comes to winning elections, attaining power...morals and integrity doesn't matter anymore."  I feel that it doesn't really matter if a person is "pro-life, anti gay marriage" if they cannot conduct their campaign with integrity.  Once a  person does that, their character is being questioned and they lose trust from everyone regardless of what the believe in.  Its the most damaging when that person "represents" christians. 

As for being upset about the spectators, I am.  I am disgusted with the outright racism be expressed by the spectators.  I don't know if I was making myself clear, but the rallies I was talking about, were rallies that were held by McCain and Palin in Strongsville, OH, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina.  Some of the rallies have turned into a lynching mob.  Its one thing when the audience boos a person, its another when the audience is screaming "kill him" "lynch him", "traitor", "arab", "terrorist" or a guy holding a stuffed monkey labeled Obama.  But at the same time McCain and Palin has to be held accountable.  McCain and the Palin have the power to tell their audience to be quiet, or to tell their audience that they are wrong to say such things.  I don't believe that Obama has run the cleanest campaign, but I have a lot of respect for him and Biden to tell their supporters to knock it off when they were making fun of Bristol Palin's pregnancy.  Obama had many oppertunities to dig up a ton of dirt on McCain (Keating 5, McCain leaving his first wife after she almost died in a car accident, Palin's abusive power etc.) but he didn't.  When McCain and Palin do not tell their audience to be respectful...they are sending out a message.  It is a message saying that they are okay with their audience slandering their opponent racially.  Their silence approves of that.

Posted 10/13/2008 9:16 PM by RyanC481 - reply

Visit RyanC481's Xanga Site!

@moonpi - Thanks for your comments Andrew.  I'm not sure if my criticism was that mature.  I am trying to be self-controled when doing criticism...its very easy to get carried away and become very emotionally charged (politics really does that to people).  That insult of Palin is really stupid though.  I kind of don't know about Palin.  On one hand I'm supposed to root for her because she is an "Evangelical", I do want a Christian who isn't going to embarrass the Christian community.  On the other hand I am very dumbfounded at her lack of awareness in very basic things (knowing the concept of Roe vs. Wade)...she also comes off as a charicature during the VP debate (winking to the cameras).  I have to admit it really doesn't help that she was found guilty last Friday for using her entire staff to fire a guy for personal/family reasons.

Posted 10/13/2008 9:26 PM by RyanC481 - reply

Visit Riceman5938's Xanga Site!

@RyanC481 - Oh I agree with everything you're saying against McCain and Palin and the Republican Party and also the right-wing conservative Christians, ... but with that being said... I simply don't feel comfortable voting for Obama.  I can't vote for Obama based primarily on integrity for the past year or so (meaning, not that he hasn't run the campaign well, but rather... 1 year isn't enough to tell me about his integrity) and I can't vote for Obama for platform.  McCain's history seems to be more "rough and ragged" politically speaking, but Obama's is... mostly unknown and won't let anybody know anything about his past.

I guess we're down to deciding if we're going to vote for either (a) strictly Integrity, (b) strictly Platform, (c) both, or ... maybe even (d) trying to "guess" how the one would be able to perform AS President based on what (little) we know of Integrity and Platform.  McCain's integrity as "sour" as it looks now... despite his age... may BE better as a President.  Of course, the argument is, If he would go "so low" to take pot-shots at his opponents, and also would not control the crowd in their "lynching mode" - how would he be as President.  But Obama also took pot-shots, and also has his fans/supporters all rouled up as well.

BUT - in more so accrediting how our Government works - even if hypothetically speaking, Obama does have an "interesting past" that is connected w/ "radical ideas" and it comes to light post-election... the position of President isn't completely safe/secure and it isn't with unlimited power.  If he doesn't do a good job - 4 years, he's gone... OR... if he tries to do something underhanded/scandalous, then he's impeached.  And this last bit is of more of my thinking outloud as I write... that perhaps ... there is "no harm done" if Obama becomes president.  There's just a wonder if there will necessarily be GOOD that will come out of it (i.e. the "change" he so desires to see/have... and whether or not the change he wants is indeed GOOD - both morally and practically speaking).

Thanks for the dialogue, Ryan, and your passion for wanting to be fair and true, good and just, and making reasonable/sound judgments as a Christian. =)

Posted 10/14/2008 1:27 AM by Riceman5938 - reply


Choose Identity
(?)
 
Give eProps (?)
Post a Comment
Add Link | Preview HTML comment help 


Back to RyanC481's Xanga Site!
Note: your comment will appear in RyanC481's local time zone:
GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)